![\"\"](\"https:\/\/solutionsreview.com\/expert\/files\/2023\/03\/Top-10-Risks-Of-Using-Outdated-ERP-Systems-In-2023-1-1024x1024-1.png\")
<\/p>\nThere are several dozen outdated ERP systems in the market, such as Macola, SAP R3\/ECC, and Point.Man. Older versions of Syteline or Epicor. Legacy ERP products\u00a0published by Sage, IBM, Oracle, or\u00a0Microsoft. And the list goes on. They exist across publishers as well as product categories. In some cases, the\u00a0ERP publisher may not even be supporting these products or versions. Or they may have cautioned with a warning to pull off support.<\/p>\n
While in some cases, these warnings could be just an attempt to incentivize you to switch to the version they want you on. Not all publishers are the same. Some publishers are serious, as supporting these products or versions may not make financial sense for them. They may no longer have enough install base on the product to justify upgrade and maintenance costs. Not appreciating the product life cycle may have consequences. Compare this with the car market. Which\u00a0automotive manufacturer are you aware of willing to support a car or a model forever?<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Most products have life cycles. And we need to appreciate and assess the risks of consuming against the wishes of a producer. Why do businesses want to continue using the old software? There could be several incentives why you wish to remain on the old version. It could be the perception that the software no longer costs you. Or you may not have overcome your last nightmare of inconvenient ERP installation. Yet another motivation could be the influence of your consultant, who might advise against it. The final driver could be that you may not understand the risks and benefits of upgrading it.<\/p>\n
While some consultants might claim that this is not an issue, official support from\u00a0the publisher is still essential. Why? An\u00a0ERP product is a black box. And only OEMs are experts in (or should be) fixing serious product issues. While you can hack the product with some tricks, predicting how it might behave is hard. The fixes may have implications.<\/p>\n
To explain this further, the official support is like a manufacturer\u2019s warranty or the support that comes with a car. At the same time, you might be able to take your vehicle to a local mechanic for minor fixes who may not be officially certified. Or endorsed by a manufacturer such as Honda or BMW. When an extensive repair is due, say if the engine or transmission breaks, they might pull off their hands. And then you may be left without any support. You can\u2019t afford to take such a risk with a financial software product that is considered similar to your company\u2019s brains. Imagine what would happen to your company if its brain malfunctions.<\/p>\n
Outdated\u00a0ERP systems expose you to security vulnerabilities as the core of the software is not being updated. Why is this an issue for a financial software product? We all know that financial applications store financial and confidential data about the company and its customers. If this data is leaked because of a security vulnerability, there could be a real financial risk you can\u2019t ignore.<\/p>\n
To understand this better, let\u2019s take an example. Think of security updates as your flu shots every year as a preventive measure to protect yourself from the flu. If you are not familiar with how flu shots work, we need to take them each year because as new strains of flu viruses are discovered, the vaccine needs to be updated. Similarly, when you have official support through OEM, they are vigilant of the new strains of computer viruses or threats, sending these updates yearly as support.<\/p>\n
You don\u2019t want to get \u201cERP flu,\u201d especially if you are not used to one. Because up until now, your publisher\u00a0has taken good care by providing you preventive upgrades to protect you from one.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s hard to express or demonstrate software capabilities as, for most people, the software is a huge black box. It\u2019s equally difficult to communicate why the capabilities you have right now may be outdated. The best way to understand this would be to go back to our example of cars. I am sure you would agree that a Nissan from 1992 would feel very different from the one from 2020.<\/p>\n
Now if we ask you to describe the difference between these two models some novice users might say that the design isn\u2019t as great. Or it is a no-brainer that the 2020 model will be superior. On the other hand, the folks who maintain slightly more technical knowledge about the subject might be able to comment on safety ratings. Engine power. Or superior transmission, etc. However, one thing they both will agree on is that 2020 will always be better than the one from 1992. And will provide superior capabilities because of technological advancements and improved design.<\/p>\n
The way the consulting market works is? Consultants want to work on the coolest technology and the newer products as it is good for their resumes. They want to make money by being early adopters of the technology before it becomes too crowded. The same applies to older products and technologies. Once an OEM announces a change in the strategy, the consultants want to move on from outdated\u00a0ERP systems\u00a0before their resumes become outdated. The ones left will ask for much higher rates due to insufficient expert resources.<\/p>\n
There is nothing you can do to avoid this, as this is how the talent market works. It\u2019s the supply chain, which is driven by supply and demand. To save yourself from getting into this situation, you can upgrade the product as the market moves, or you will be left behind with a car from 1992 with the transmission broken. And there will be a few expensive experts who might be able to fix it. By the way, in the case of a car, the maximum risk would be to replace it with a new one. With ERP, however, the risk is greater with disruption to your business and potential loss.<\/p>\n
The older systems would require more time for debugging and a longer time for maintenance as the OEM is not upgrading them. The reason why people upgrade their cars is not purely because of the prestige. They upgrade because the older ones cost more to maintain. The maintenance costs could be more than what it would cost to buy a brand-new car. ERPs are not any different.<\/p>\n
How many people do you see driving a car from 1992 on the road? And if you don\u2019t drive that old car yourself, why would you take the risk of using outdated ERP systems? I am pretty sure you would agree that it\u2019s not a very smart decision.<\/p>\n
When the older technologies were designed, mobile devices were not as prevalent, and because of that, they were not designed to be compatible with mobile devices. Modern cloud software offers anywhere, any device capabilities, which means you could have real-time insight at your fingertips, along with the ability to operate your ERP from a mobile phone.<\/p>\n
Your car from 1992 is less likely to be reliable and might break a lot. The same applies to your ERP. Since the software is not being upgraded, it might break often, and your consultants might take longer to fix it as they would not know what might be breaking it. This might disrupt your business processes as you might not be able to fulfill your order or cut invoices.<\/p>\n
Even if your consultants can hack software, the software may not work with newer versions of databases, which would mean the software may not be compatible with the operating system or the hardware.<\/p>\n
Typically modern software automatically upgrades with changes in laws and regulations, such as changes with PCI compliance, data security, new tax laws, and new accounting rules. Not only would you be missing these features, but there could also be hefty fines for being non-compliant with these regulations.<\/p>\n
Irrespective of whether you are a\u00a0small business\u00a0or a\u00a0large one, today\u2019s customers have similar expectations as Amazon when it comes to experience expectations. They prefer reliability and traceability with the order, and the only businesses they want to engage in are the ones that are predictable and credible. The risky software only introduces unpredictability to your capabilities to deliver with credibility.<\/p>\n
The same applies to employee experience as well. Millennials grew up using their mobile devices and Facebook. They would rather work for your competitors than make their life hell by using clunky, legacy software. Finding talent is already challenging, and you don\u2019t want the software to be the reason for losing the best talent.<\/p>\n
Switching from outdated\u00a0ERP systems requires tons of planning, and if you don\u2019t want to be like a deer in the headlights, you may want to align your ERP upgrade process with the market. It\u2019s not too bad if you skipped a model or two, but driving a car from 1992 isn\u2019t very smart either.<\/p>\n